![]() Those movies had Jedi, and Wookies, and lightsabers, planet battles, the Force and stuff. So when the Star Trek prequel/sequel came out, I bought a fresh pack of Tena and bought a ticket to see the movie. However, I, unlike many Star Trek purists, enjoyed the 2009 reboot. That alone would complicate getting them to play their original roles. Not to mention DeForest Kelley and James Doohan are dead. William Shatner may be a thoroughly entertaining actor, but there is no way Shatner could pull off playing a young, Starfleet Academy-aged James Kirk. I don’t see how they could have been angry. This was and is (still) very upsetting to some Star Trek fans. The “wrong” was that for the first time in Star Trek history, a Star Trek movie based on the original characters created by Gene Roddenberry would not feature the original actors. Worse than a mining disaster on Praxis wrong. If you asked the die-hard Trekker crowd, plenty did believe that there was something terribly wrong with a J.J. A Star Trek reboot directed by the guy who did Lost and staring the guy who played Sylar on Heroes could not go wrong. Abrams would be helming the reboot I nearly soiled my drawers in anticipation.Īfter all, I thought. ![]() Like many sci-fi fans, I eagerly awaited the theatrical reboot of the Star Trek franchise. If that’s an indication that I’m stupid, I’d be the last person to figure that out. But in a room full of philosophy lightweights, the guy who watches Star Trek is a fucking philosophy genius.” – The Mindless Philosopher “Chuck Klosterman wrote that science fiction is philosophy for stupid people. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |